#Tolkien and Diversity, Revisited

John Cole at Balloon Juice started up a lively discussion on a recent kerfuffle over ethnic diversity in the casting of “The Hobbit.” The post brought me back to 2005, when MPomy, then at Blogerantz, contemplated whether “The Lord of the Rings” was racist. His short response: I don’t think so.

I think this criticism of racial myopia (though perhaps accurate) is a cheap shot. I think it’s something you say if you don’t want to like these movies. Does Samuel L. Jackson save the Star Wars prequels from their obvious failings in the realm of dialog and character? Are the (wonderful) films of Curtis Hanson – LA Confidential and Wonder Boys – diminished by his failure to feature characters of color in leading roles?

One must also be aware that another major theme of Tolkien, which is played out fairly well in the film versions, is relations and relationships between characters and racial groups that have hated one another for centuries – see dwarves v. elves. This is resolved in favor of a recognition that, while celebrating their diversity, these groups can look beyond their differences, particularly those which are merely skin deep.

Garcia then chimed in.

If you read the Lord of the Rings trilogy carefully, though, and then look at the map, the whole thing is a LOT like WWI, and even pre-WWI, Europe. Is it not odd that Hobbiton is in the NW? Is it not odd that the blonde elves are from the area that is placed geographically a lot like where Scandinavia and Germany would be? And isn’t it ODD that the rogue forces from the South are dark-skinned, and their territory is not even shown on the Middle Earth map? For me, it’s like a combination of the legendary fear of the Mongol Hordes (something that comes up again and again in Icelandic sagas, which were based on Nordic sagas, but hey, i’m no Comp. Lit. expert, o.k.?) and Tolkien’s own experiences in WWI.

I then added the longest comment I’ve put on any blog anywhere.

I haven’t read the Tolkien books, so I have no idea whether his works are racist or not. I’m only talking about the movies (all of which I’ve seen), and specifically, the director’s choice of exclusively casting actors of European descent (at least among the principals).

It had to have been a conscious choice, in my view. No way could the all white cast been an oversight on Jackson’s part, especially given the diversity flap that Star Wars provoked.

My question is, why would Jackson make that choice of an all-white cast? Maybe to try and stay faithful to Tolkien’s vision, descriptions of the characters, etc.? But that doesn’t wash. Shakespeare probably never thought of Hamlet as anything but white, but that doesn’t stop the RSC from casting Hamlets of different ethnic backgrounds.


4 Comments on “#Tolkien and Diversity, Revisited”

  1. mpomy says:

    Spirited discussion about important topics! Let us imagine, for a moment, that both Jackson and Tolkien are full-on racists. If we know, from an impossibly objective point of view, that these artists posses this characteristic, how does that change the way in which we experience their artwork?

    I have no good answer. Perhaps a few years ago, I would have said that it matters not at all. Certainly many of my musical heroes have exhibited abhorrent behavior with respect to drugs, alcohol, women, etc. We may very well adore the work of artists in whose company we would not wish to spend a single minute. On the topic of race, much could be said about Joseph Conrad.

    But I am now reminded of my own hometown football club and their ex-convict quarterback. What he did to innocent animals bears no relationship to what he does for “my” team, but I can’t get beyond it. And he has done nothing to show that he has changed his mind about horrific behavior in which he willfully engaged. I’m having a hard time “forgiving” his shortcoming, despite his artistry on the football field.

  2. Gillies says:

    Separating artist from artwork. That is a tough one. It works both ways too. I can’t say I don’t appreciate Neil Young all the more for being into electric cars (even though his LincVolt just blew up, I think).

    I’ve actually thought a bit about Vick lately (given his performance against the Redskins recently). If he did show genuine remorse for what he did, then there’s redemption, which is powerful. But if he hasn’t shown remorse, that’s just evil winning. I don’t know. Didn’t he do some stuff with the Humane Society? Was it BS? I’ll have to google around.

  3. mpomy says:

    Apparently God informed him what he did was wrong. That presumes that he couldn’t figure it out on his own. WTF?!?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 120 other followers